The Pure Dude and Fug Act
As the repercussions of the latest Chinese tainted food scandal continue to be felt, it is worth noting to any neighborhood ideologues that there IS a difference between good regulations and bad, and that you fail a pretty basic critical thinking skills test if you can’t tell that on sight. The fact is, in a commercial state of nature, companies will act like cavemen and do pretty much everything they can get away with to make a few more pennies. Chinese businessmen killing our pets and their babies with bad food, or Wall Street committing mass suicide should be a strong hint that regulation can be a good thing…
…A Republican president got the Pure Food and Drug Act passed, but that part of the party is deader than Elvis. It’s a shame.
This entry was posted on Tuesday, September 30th, 2008 at 12:22 pm and is filed under The Political Mindscape. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.






September 30th, 2008 at 2:32 pm
A bigger shame, to me, is that there are still plenty of people who identify themselves as moderate Republicans, and support their party - and McCain - completely ignorant of your very true last statement.
I really the far right’s attempt to take down actual moderate Republicans, like Lincoln Chafee, would have been the wake up call, but I guess not.
September 30th, 2008 at 2:33 pm
Right. It seems to me, however, that it’s a lot easier to properly regulate food than it is to properly regulate the financial sector in the 21st century.
If it’s being done right, it’s probably NOT being done by the US government. I say this as a registered Dem (do not forget the Dems’ complicity in the Fannie and Freddie debacles).