<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Myth of American Military Genius</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wholesomereading.com/2008/11/23/the-myth-of-american-military-genius/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wholesomereading.com/2008/11/23/the-myth-of-american-military-genius/</link>
	<description>Musings on culture and politics by baseball writer Steven Goldman</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 10:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: spanish american war &#124; Intel.com</title>
		<link>http://www.wholesomereading.com/2008/11/23/the-myth-of-american-military-genius/#comment-446</link>
		<dc:creator>spanish american war &#124; Intel.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 15:20:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wholesomereading.com/?p=267#comment-446</guid>
		<description>[...] The Myth of American Military Genius &#8230; and maybe another 11 million civilians. The U.S. lost under 420,000 in combat and less than 2,000 civilians. Korea, Vietnam, the less said about these conflicts the better. Ditto the current Iraq and Afghanistan. That leaves what as the big American wins? The Mexican War, the Spanish-American War (we &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Myth of American Military Genius &#8230; and maybe another 11 million civilians. The U.S. lost under 420,000 in combat and less than 2,000 civilians. Korea, Vietnam, the less said about these conflicts the better. Ditto the current Iraq and Afghanistan. That leaves what as the big American wins? The Mexican War, the Spanish-American War (we &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob in CT</title>
		<link>http://www.wholesomereading.com/2008/11/23/the-myth-of-american-military-genius/#comment-428</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob in CT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 18:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wholesomereading.com/?p=267#comment-428</guid>
		<description>The generalship during the Civil War was shockingly bad at times, it's true, but in all fairness one has to consider what those generals had going against them, too.  Masses of largely untrained troops (particularly on the Union side), weaponry that significantly favored the defender, logistical nightmares (particularly for the Confeds).  Lee looks GREAT on defense, and pretty bad on offense (not just Gettysburg).  They all look pretty bad on offense, with the possible exception of Sherman.  

I've always thought of WWI as the single best example of abject military stupidity.  The US Civil War had already shown, rather conclusively in my opinion, what happens when you line up a bunch of guys and march (or run, even) at an entrenched enemy (or an enemy otherwise benefitting from, say, terrain.  Battle of the Wilderness, anyone?).  And that was before machine guns got really good.  The European nations had military advisors who witnessed this.  They presumably wrote reports about it.  Plus, then they had the Crimean war to confirm it.  

Btw, I thought Market Garden was a decent gamble.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The generalship during the Civil War was shockingly bad at times, it&#8217;s true, but in all fairness one has to consider what those generals had going against them, too.  Masses of largely untrained troops (particularly on the Union side), weaponry that significantly favored the defender, logistical nightmares (particularly for the Confeds).  Lee looks GREAT on defense, and pretty bad on offense (not just Gettysburg).  They all look pretty bad on offense, with the possible exception of Sherman.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve always thought of WWI as the single best example of abject military stupidity.  The US Civil War had already shown, rather conclusively in my opinion, what happens when you line up a bunch of guys and march (or run, even) at an entrenched enemy (or an enemy otherwise benefitting from, say, terrain.  Battle of the Wilderness, anyone?).  And that was before machine guns got really good.  The European nations had military advisors who witnessed this.  They presumably wrote reports about it.  Plus, then they had the Crimean war to confirm it.  </p>
<p>Btw, I thought Market Garden was a decent gamble.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://www.wholesomereading.com/2008/11/23/the-myth-of-american-military-genius/#comment-413</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 17:57:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wholesomereading.com/?p=267#comment-413</guid>
		<description>First, I have to assume that during Mike's last paragraph he was possessed by Stephen Colbert.

Second, might as well point out that the military intelligence during the War of 1812 was so bad, one of its major battles, the Battle of New Orleans, took place after the war was over. That'd be like the Phils and and Rays meeting for a Game 6. Oh, and Joe Maddon would have been killed, too.

Third, as badly as the war was generalled (can that be a verb?), you have to say we won the Civil War as we were both sides.

Or, fourth, you can steal Kevin Kline's line as the dumb yet patriotic Otto from "A Fish Called Wanda" when he insisted Vietnam was a tie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, I have to assume that during Mike&#8217;s last paragraph he was possessed by Stephen Colbert.</p>
<p>Second, might as well point out that the military intelligence during the War of 1812 was so bad, one of its major battles, the Battle of New Orleans, took place after the war was over. That&#8217;d be like the Phils and and Rays meeting for a Game 6. Oh, and Joe Maddon would have been killed, too.</p>
<p>Third, as badly as the war was generalled (can that be a verb?), you have to say we won the Civil War as we were both sides.</p>
<p>Or, fourth, you can steal Kevin Kline&#8217;s line as the dumb yet patriotic Otto from &#8220;A Fish Called Wanda&#8221; when he insisted Vietnam was a tie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://www.wholesomereading.com/2008/11/23/the-myth-of-american-military-genius/#comment-410</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 16:14:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wholesomereading.com/?p=267#comment-410</guid>
		<description>This just goes to show the "myth" of any Army's ( or Navy's ) genius - we can look at the British army/navy, colonial campaigns by virtually everyone, Japan, Russia's Red Army, Germany's General Staff, Israel - history has an endless number of reputed mythical armed forces/leaders which crumble upon inspection.

Yet the US invaded and controls 2 nations 1/2 way around the world for the cost of fewer than 5,000 soldier's lives over a 7 year period....and without a war economy, war-bonds, direct sacrifices at home, a draft etc....The US might not be the best, but not so bad after all</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This just goes to show the &#8220;myth&#8221; of any Army&#8217;s ( or Navy&#8217;s ) genius - we can look at the British army/navy, colonial campaigns by virtually everyone, Japan, Russia&#8217;s Red Army, Germany&#8217;s General Staff, Israel - history has an endless number of reputed mythical armed forces/leaders which crumble upon inspection.</p>
<p>Yet the US invaded and controls 2 nations 1/2 way around the world for the cost of fewer than 5,000 soldier&#8217;s lives over a 7 year period&#8230;.and without a war economy, war-bonds, direct sacrifices at home, a draft etc&#8230;.The US might not be the best, but not so bad after all</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rocksfan</title>
		<link>http://www.wholesomereading.com/2008/11/23/the-myth-of-american-military-genius/#comment-404</link>
		<dc:creator>Rocksfan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 18:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wholesomereading.com/?p=267#comment-404</guid>
		<description>The South hurt itself by shooting Stonewall Jackson.  The North could have helped itself by shooting any number of Generals...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The South hurt itself by shooting Stonewall Jackson.  The North could have helped itself by shooting any number of Generals&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://www.wholesomereading.com/2008/11/23/the-myth-of-american-military-genius/#comment-403</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 04:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wholesomereading.com/?p=267#comment-403</guid>
		<description>Careful-You're going to get 10,000 Civil War nerds who will go on and on and on and on and on about glory and honah and what not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Careful-You&#8217;re going to get 10,000 Civil War nerds who will go on and on and on and on and on about glory and honah and what not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

